Comments - Chad Dezern Gives New Info About Both the Movie and the Game - Page 2

Avatar - KadenKat
KadenKat Jul 6, 2015, 1:15:47 AM

@Animovie Ratchet
    "@HydraTank
        "So, does that mean that the movie and game are purely Qwark's take on the origin story and do not completely reboot the series as a whole? emoji"
    
    No, the movie is what actually happened. The game is Qwark's fake take on the movie's storyline."
So… is the game non-canon?

Avatar - Kirito
Kirito Jul 6, 2015, 1:34:12 AM

@KadenKat
    "@Animovie Ratchet
        "@HydraTank
            "So, does that mean that the movie and game are purely Qwark's take on the origin story and do not completely reboot the series as a whole? emoji"
        
        No, the movie is what actually happened. The game is Qwark's fake take on the movie's storyline."
    
    So… is the game non-canon?"
Its definitely canon. But not exactly accurate. I'd call it 'streatched canon' since it will be what really happened, just through Qwarks eyes.

Avatar - ankadewo
ankadewo Jul 6, 2015, 11:24:44 AM

Oh no. No. No. Through Qwark's eyes? We all know of his reputation for faking stories. Unless if Qwark is actually telling the truth, or either Ratchet or Clank took over the role as the narrator.

Avatar - Ratchetruler
Ratchetruler Jul 6, 2015, 12:27:27 PM

I am very pessimistic about this narrative. I rather prefer playing games that actually are cannon in their own universe. Even if it's as mad as what Metal Gear Rising did. Having the key difference between the movie and game be that Qwark is elaborating more on the story in a way that may not be true just brings up alarm bells that much of this story may not happen.
To be fair I loved Call of Juarez: Gunslinger, and if this is anything like that game's narrative then I'm sure it'll be fine. But knowing Qwark, we really can't believe that anything has happened at all.
Only time will tell, and while I'm sure I will be disappointed by this narrative style, I'm sure it will be a fun story nonetheless.