If you could have any RaC weapon in any game, what would it be?
I would have the Winterizer!
"So we fix our eyes not on what is seen, but on what is unseen, since what is seen is temporary, but what is unseen is eternal."
If you could have any RaC weapon in any game, what would it be?
I would have the Winterizer!
"So we fix our eyes not on what is seen, but on what is unseen, since what is seen is temporary, but what is unseen is eternal."
Messages: 3875
This is in the wrong board.
I would choose the Infect-o-Bomb. Most human people are physically very weak, so will offer no resistance to the power of this gun. Which means I would never have to re-infect the same person twice. And I could also finally establish that evil empire I've been planning on building.
And then I shall hold the world hostage for…
1 MILLION DOLLARS!
Messages: 1638
So if Jet Boots (Secret Agent Clank) work pretty identically to Hoverboots (aside from hovering), then Hoverboots would work as a weapon by aiming jets into enemy's face.
So I would want Hoverboots.
(In my most-wanted game stuff it's just behind the A-Grav Zoomer.)
5head
Nightmare box, then people won't bother me when I want to be in my room.
Now officially addicted to League of Legends.
Send help.
Didn't we already have a thread like this?
This is the Signature Box. Writing in it means that things will appear under your posts; write as you please, for example: Why not describe the purpose of the Signature Box?
Didn't we already have a thread like this?
2012 was 2 years ago.
Now officially addicted to League of Legends.
Send help.
I know it was; but if I remember correctly, the rules encouraged going back to old threads instead of creating duplicate threads…
That said we only have one moderator anymore, and they're barely ever online, so I don't suppose it really matters…
This is the Signature Box. Writing in it means that things will appear under your posts; write as you please, for example: Why not describe the purpose of the Signature Box?
I know it was; but if I remember correctly, the rules encouraged going back to old threads instead of creating duplicate threads…
That said we only have one moderator anymore, and they're barely ever online, so I don't suppose it really matters…
Really? Most forums I go to don't really like people bumping old threads.
Mods just lock the old thread and tell the… bumper… to create a new one the next time they want to discuss an old topic.
Now officially addicted to League of Legends.
Send help.
I don't really remember - anyway it's been so long since we actually had moderators here on a regular basis that we may as well adapt our own rules and moderate them ourselves…
Since there's not really any harm in making a new thread we may as well use this one for now.
This is the Signature Box. Writing in it means that things will appear under your posts; write as you please, for example: Why not describe the purpose of the Signature Box?
Oops sorry, didnt know. Keep in mind that I'm new.
"So we fix our eyes not on what is seen, but on what is unseen, since what is seen is temporary, but what is unseen is eternal."
Oops sorry, didnt know. Keep in mind that I'm new.
That's fine. Like we said; it's been so long since the site had a proper moderator, nobody can really remember the rules…
This is the Signature Box. Writing in it means that things will appear under your posts; write as you please, for example: Why not describe the purpose of the Signature Box?
Messages: 3875
The rules aren't that unclear. I mean they only really become a problem when there are a large number of active users, but ultimately we don't want duplicate threads. However Necro-bumping is worse, so instead of reviving old topics, just start a new one.
I'd say if a thread has been inactive 9 or more months then it would be a bad idea to revive it (This would be tighter if there were more active users). This is because it will cause confusion, and most of the comments and users will be gone or well over the topic, and all the conversations will be long lost anyway.
Messages: 947
Not exactly a weapon, but close enough
"So we fix our eyes not on what is seen, but on what is unseen, since what is seen is temporary, but what is unseen is eternal."
Messages: 1638
Not exactly a weapon, but close enough
Well, it passed your weapon contest
5head